3 ms·
There was no influence. Attempt to interfere != influence. And the evidence for that is non-existing. And Steele dossier was created by russian drunk.
by YarickR2 6y ago
There was no influence. Attempt to interfere != influence. And the evidence for that is non-existing. And Steele dossier was created by russian drunk.
- mrlala 6y agoFirst, I'm not taking a hard position on anything here- I'm linking the Senate Intelligence Committee's findings. If you don't believe it? Well, that's your problem I'm just stating what's in there >There was no influence Go here again https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/press/senate-intel-releases-new-report-intel-community-assessment-russian-interference https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/press/senate-intel-relea... and open up the 4 PDF's Volume 1/2/3/4 Open Volume 2. Search for the word "influence". You might notice you have about a billion matches. Here is one significant quote >Arriving at a similar conclusion, an Oxford Internet Institute study-of 17 million tweets posted during the 2016 election found that bots "reached positions of measurable influence," and "did infiltrate the upper cores of influence and were thus jn a position to significantly influence digital communications during the 2016 U.S. election." So, you are going to continue to state "there was no influence" even though hundreds of pages of reports from the Senate Intel say otherwise?