3 ms·
From my understanding, most of the cases that have been thrown out were due to lack of standing not evidentiary merit.
by themaninthedark 6y ago
From my understanding, most of the cases that have been thrown out were due to lack of standing not evidentiary merit.
- oldfriend 6y agoThat's correct, many of the complaints have been dismissed for non-evidentiary reasons. The talking point that 50 cases have been dismissed is at best misleading. There have been a wide variety of complaints, in multiple jurisdictions, from multiple plantiffs, alleging a variety of facts. Drawing any single conclusion about the entirety of evidence based on this aggregation of dissimilars is tenuous at best. As they said, perhaps an example of dunning kruger in action.