4 ms·
There's no refutation because there's no argument to refute. It's always some form of "There are bad people doing bad things and we need to stop them." Notice
by rriepe 6y ago
There's no refutation because there's no argument to refute. It's always some form of "There are bad people doing bad things and we need to stop them."
Notice how every thread here is about acting against alleged disinformation agents? It's not about any argument at all. It's a generic outgroup argument.
Should we expect people to just never question elections? It's completely bizarre.
- ribosometronome 6y agoCome on. That same group questioning elections 1) has spent 4 years decrying the questioning of an election 2) actively prevented measures being taken to secure elections and 3) hasn't come up with any proof of vote changes. We should expect people to come at things in good faith, which is clearly not the case in this discussion.