> It's better to fail at doing something aggressive than to fail to innovate. I don't think that's a particularly useful way to divide up failures. I think it'

> It's better to fail at doing something aggressive than to fail to innovate. I don't think that's a particularly useful way to divide up failures. I think it's better to fail in a way that doesn't kill people than a way that does. Whether you kill people by being too conservative or too aggressive with your design is pretty irrelevant compared to that.