3 ms·
I don't really know the precise details, but I'm pretty sure their pay model changed after the backlash(and being sued) to the tip-stealing. Still, I wouldn't
by ravenstine 6y ago
I don't really know the precise details, but I'm pretty sure their pay model changed after the backlash(and being sued) to the tip-stealing.
Still, I wouldn't choose DoorDash unless it was the only option in my area. When I was driving for GrubHub I met a lot of other delivery drivers and everyone considered DoorDash to be the the worst in terms of treatment of drivers. In other words, bad support and tip stealing. We referred to it as "DoorTrash" or "PoorDash" for that reason. Postmates has pretty much nonexistent driver support but at least they didn't steal tips and it was pretty difficult to get fired from it randomly.
- ceejayoz 6y agoI'm pretty sure an organization willing to play with that sort of dark pattern has any number of other dark patterns in the wings.
- frakkingcylons 6y agoThey eventually changed it but they defended their behavior repeatedly as if it was fine and not exploitative to their delivery drivers.
- lambda_obrien 6y agoA company that would allow that in the first place should not be trusted later on, claiming they "fixed it". It's such a clear violation of ethics and morals. I don't get how a corporation can literally steal money from it's employees, say it's "sorry" and it "fixed the problem" and get off freely.
- mrbazinga 6y agoWell spending millions of dollars on Prop 22 ensured that they're technically not "employees"
- lambda_obrien 6y agoThe "technically" in that sentence is the evil part of their argument, IMO.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]