4 ms·
Then let the courts decide that. There's no need for Google to get ahead of it. It's not like Youtube is running out of space.
by ghiculescu 6y ago
Then let the courts decide that. There's no need for Google to get ahead of it. It's not like Youtube is running out of space.
- tptacek 6y agoThat doesn't even make sense. There are all sorts of things a court won't strike down that practically nobody thinks Google should broadcast on Youtube. Go look at the Youtube content guidelines and see how many have anything to do with what a court thinks.
- rat87 6y agoIt is Google's responsibility They provided the forum, they need to moderate it
- tptacek 6y agoThey don't need to; they can be Gab.ai if they want. But almost nobody in the world wants to be that.
- asah 6y agoactually... sorry to gently disagree: the crazies are unfortunately amplifying each other and unchecked, the result will be people taking guns off the rack and people actually dying. Moving to wingnut-only platforms isn't a great solution, but at least it de-legitimizes the crazy and stops it from being "recommended" content on random peoples' screens. example of crazy plot? hereya go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gretchen_Whitmer_kidnapping_plot https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gretchen_Whitmer_kidnapping_pl...
- odessacubbage 6y agoit's bold to assume that anyone isn't crazy at this point, most alarmingly our institutions themselves