3 ms·
Just to provide a counter-point, from a usability point of view I found that article terrible. On the 1920 pixels wide screen at work, more than half the horiz
by unwind 16y ago
Just to provide a counter-point, from a usability point of view I found that article terrible.
On the 1920 pixels wide screen at work, more than half the horizontal width became buttons (previous and next). As soon as the mouse pointer was outside the white background for the linked-to article, a click lead to navigating away from the article.
It took me at least two or three times of wondering where the fsck the article I was reading went, before I realized what was going on. Apparantly randomly clicking on what looks like (and ought to be) passive whitespace is a bad habit, on today's web.
- ThomPete 16y agoWho cares about the usability of this site. It's not done to be user friendly but rather to be explorable.
- JonnieCache 16y ago>On the 1920 pixels wide screen at work, more than half the horizontal width became buttons (previous and next) I think my adoration may have been influenced by the fact that my monitors are in portrait orientation. And I use a trackball. I'm a sucker for contrarianism. Maybe I should start using visual studio?
- lallysingh 16y agoPlease, a little consideration. I just finished breakfast, and it was tasty. I'd prefer to keep it down.