3 ms·
Critical data for the average user typically does not require much space, so the cost of storage overhead in a mirrored ZFS pool is not too bad. RAIDZ is much
by Cyph0n 6y ago
Critical data for the average user typically does not require much space, so the cost of storage overhead in a mirrored ZFS pool is not too bad.
RAIDZ is much more cost efficient when you need to reliably store large content that isn’t really critical. As you’ve noted, media is one good example of this.
In my case, I’m using a RAIDZ1 vdev of 3 disks, with the understanding that things could go south during a resilver.
- nix23 6y agoYeah true, in my Home-server i have one mirror (2 disks for OS/Swap etc) and one RaidZ1 (5 Disks for data), for me it's just important that i have no bit-rot etc. Daily backups (restic) are made so no problem whatsoever.