4 ms·
This presents a nice way of dealing with Twitter, if it fits your use case. Some good choices too (e.g. Plausible for analytics). Only thing I wonder is, why
by rapnie 6y ago
This presents a nice way of dealing with Twitter, if it fits your use case.
Some good choices too (e.g. Plausible for analytics).
Only thing I wonder is, why I can only learn that you are Mailbrew Inc. from the PP or Terms of Services, and ...
> For our Patron in-app purchase flow, we collect related information such as payment amounts, times and currencies to validate and secure payments.
... that your revenue model apparently is in-app purchases?
Why not be more open about that with a nice About page where you present yourself and the product you offer.
(Note that this same feedback holds for so many services that are launched, where the lack of this transparency imho is an oversight).
- linuz90 6y agoThanks so much for the feedback! We've put a "by Mailbrew" logo in the header, and also if you click on the chat widget in the bottom left corner of the app, you'll see info about the team. As for the business model, this is a little experiment to play with the write-only Twitter idea and create awareness around Mailbrew, which is our main product and core business. Finally regarding Plausible, it's not just better because of how privacy-friendly it is, it's also such a great product that we recommend everyone to use.