3 ms·
> The leaked photo dates back to 2018, when it materialized in an intelligence report from the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) It is much easi
by davidhyde 6y ago
> The leaked photo dates back to 2018, when it materialized in an intelligence report from the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF)
It is much easier to argue how an artefact could be injected into a digital image than to explain how the digital phenomenon itself could exist yet speculation about these things almost always centres around physical phenomenon and lighting effects. It is commonly assumed that the image taken by the image sensor is what people are seeing when there is no reason to believe this outright.