3 ms·
1. It's not a cube. Read the article. It's "bell-shaped." 2. Were it indeed a cube, identification would be easy: The Borg.
by pseingatl 6y ago
1. It's not a cube. Read the article. It's "bell-shaped."
2. Were it indeed a cube, identification would be easy: The Borg.
- thu2111 6y agoRead the article? The article manages to describe it in the first paragraph like this: The object in the photo has been described by U.S. officials as silver and “cube-shaped,” according to a report from The Debrief, which first shared the image. which is ridiculous because it's clearly not. Are they talking about a totally different photo I wonder? Later in the article the guy who took the photo is quoted as saying: It’s likely that a backseat weapons system operator on an F/A-18F Super Hornet took the photo of the object, which McMillan calls “inverted” and “bell-shaped,” and describes it having “ridges or other protrusions along its lateral edges, extending toward its base.” So there's something seriously wrong with this article.