3 ms·
Agreed. It achieves a marginal increase in readability at the cost of all kinds of screwy implicit behavior. I like languages with dumb syntax that editors and
by cageface 16y ago
Agreed. It achieves a marginal increase in readability at the cost of all kinds of screwy implicit behavior. I like languages with dumb syntax that editors and IDEs can understand.
- uriel 16y agoGo's syntax is one of the 'dumbest' around, it is extremely easy to parse compared to pretty much any other mainstream language (except scheme I guess). All the bitching about ';' comes from people that clearly have not used Go or tried to parse it.