3 ms·
But why is it a problem that rural areas don't have telecom services? If they truly valued those services, they could move to where they are available. These I
by sagarm 6y ago
But why is it a problem that rural areas don't have telecom services? If they truly valued those services, they could move to where they are available.
These ISP subsidies are a classic example of government waste. ISPs promise, don't deliver, and are awarded even more cash to burn. There's no reason we should support this waste of our tax dollars.
- azernik 6y agoBecause the government has decided that the existence and viability of rural communities is a policy goal in and of itself; and that basic telecommunications services are necessary for public safety and good government in such communities. See also USPS's Universal Service Obligation, which requires it to have a minimum level of service to every single address/user in the US. This is common in developed countries (e.g. the EU requires all its member states to have universal service for both post and telecommunications). China isn't there yet, but is working towards that goal.
- sagarm 6y agoSimilarly, most developed countries have some form of universal healthcare. Nonetheless in America, this is considered an un-American example of socialism run amok. The same pro-individualist criticism applies to rural telecom, postal service, and infrastructure. And it applies even more directly to rural hospitals.