1) The article clearly makes a distinction between the types of warrants. Serving warrants in general dangerous, point blank - and even 'white collar criminals

1) The article clearly makes a distinction between the types of warrants. Serving warrants in general dangerous, point blank - and even 'white collar criminals' who don't answer the door are giving indication that something may be up. It's 100% reasonable for the police to have their weapons upholstered at that point and well within reasonable SOP. 2) There's no evidence of corruption on behalf of the officials in Florida - this is the continued misrepresentation of some in the press, and easy echo-chamber populism. There as an argument over how data should be represented; disagreeing with your employer is not 'whistleblowing'. Again - Florida releases considerably more detailed information than they do in any province in Canada and somehow, everyone seems to think that we are doing 'such a great job in governance'. The overall level of wilful ignorance on these nuanced incidents in shameful. Even so-called smart people believe what their emotional triggers and biases want them to believe. I'm looking forward to hearing what the courts have to say about it.