4 ms·
Wow tough crowd. I appreciate the pragmatic approach taken here, and as long as there is type safety round nulls im happy to use the language. Nitpick: As of C
by tybit 6y ago
Wow tough crowd. I appreciate the pragmatic approach taken here, and as long as there is type safety round nulls im happy to use the language.
Nitpick: As of C# 8 they’ve mostly solved nullable types for classes too with nullable reference types (though retrofitting it made it awkward and imperfect).
- munificent 6y agoIf you talk about type systems, the static FP folks naturally show up and according to many of them, anything that SML/Haskell doesn't do must be wrong. :)