2 ms·
That's assuming the businesses using the Apache Licensed version are comfortable with the original developer moving to xGPL. Also, the businesses need to be w
by ignoramous 6y ago
That's assuming the businesses using the Apache Licensed version are comfortable with the original developer moving to xGPL.
Also, the businesses need to be wary of other proprietary code they might have to now open source as an unintended side-effect of moving to xGPL.
- josephcsible 6y agoWhat if you went with GPLv2 only as your license? It isn't AGPL-compatible, so nobody could release an AGPL fork, and then companies wouldn't have to worry about it unless they distributed your code to other people, rather than just using it themselves, with the former being way less common than the latter. And most companies are okay with GPLv2 since they use Linux.