3 ms·
When I got started in business in the late 2000s, I was constantly fighting for Debian vs. CentOS, and eventually was forced to concede -- 95% of my customers w
by abalashov 6y ago
When I got started in business in the late 2000s, I was constantly fighting for Debian vs. CentOS, and eventually was forced to concede -- 95% of my customers wanted to run CentOS, all the more so given the exceptional conservatism of the telecom industry. They were attracted to its promise of long-term support and longevity, and, perhaps more vitally, it's what all the other organisations who sought an "enterprise-friendly" distribution were running.
Over time, much of my tooling and deployment processes has come to presume CentOS. If the customer base overwhelmingly runs CentOS, you build process for CentOS.
Thankfully, though, Systemd--for all its faults--has narrowed the painful deltas between Linux distributions enough that a switch back to a Debian target won't be too painful.
Where's your God now, "CentOS is something we can depend on, it's not just a rag-tag band of open-source hippies"?
- someperson 6y agoWhy don't the telecoms just pay for RHEL? The December 31 2021 deadline is brutal for high-reliability infrastructure, but it principle the migration path is super simple, right?
- abalashov 6y agoSome of them do. I've mainly got smaller companies and startup-type companies in mind.
- tlamponi 6y agoFurther, Debian gives a clean and normally very well working upgrade path, which I take anytime over Frankenstein backport updates keeping a distro release on life support until X years later one needs to redo everything.