3 ms·
First off, very cool. I'm a big Hashicorp fan, and have been following Nomad for a while, so it's exciting you hit 1.0! It seems to me one of the advantages K8
by cs-szazz 6y ago
First off, very cool. I'm a big Hashicorp fan, and have been following Nomad for a while, so it's exciting you hit 1.0!
It seems to me one of the advantages K8s has is that there are multiple "Kubernetes as a Service" services out there, such as EKS on AWS, Google Cloud's offering, even Digital Ocean.
Are there any plans to make Nomad Enterprise more accessible? It seems a managed Nomad hits the sweet spot of simple scheduling, which removes a lot of the K8s bloat for many people.
- schmichael 6y agoThanks! I think you really hit the nail on the head. In a twitter thread I talk about how Nomad 1.0 represents us implementing the "table stakes", the base foundation, for an orchestrator. However, I think what you're noticing is how the table stakes have changed from 5 years ago: orchestrators need hosted options. k8s has push-button support from every major cloud. We can't just ignore that. And we aren't ignoring that. I have no idea what I can say publicly, so I'll just link to what our cofounder/CTO has already said: > And hosted Nomad clusters are on the way https://twitter.com/mitchellh/status/1334198278225682434 https://twitter.com/mitchellh/status/1334198278225682434
- cs-szazz 6y agoThanks! I wish Hashicorp the best of luck getting hosted clusters out the door, totally agree with you about table stakes.