3 ms·
I'm saying there isn't one (well, a hundred messages in and there are a handful at last :) ). Nobody is discussing what's new for instance. I'd be interested in
by brnt 6y ago
I'm saying there isn't one (well, a hundred messages in and there are a handful at last :) ). Nobody is discussing what's new for instance. I'd be interested in the status of moc (isn't mentioned on the page).
- stagger87 6y agoThe MOC is still present in Qt 6.0, if that is what you are asking.
- kevin_thibedeau 6y agoEven with CMake?
- alvarelle 6y agoYes. That's orthogonal. And people have been using CMake with Qt (and moc) for almost as long as cmake exists
- omegote 6y agoQuestion should be "even with C++17?". Cmake has had moc and uic support for years now. The question is why they don't leverage the c++17 features to get rid of moc, ffs.
- marcthe12 6y agoThere is some features used by moc expected in c++23 like reflection. I think that in qt 7 they will drop moc an some stl replcements in qtcore
- rualca 6y ago> Even with CMake? Why would Cmake eliminate the need for Qt's moc? Cmake is a build system/makefile generator. You don't generate c++ from form files or Qt-annotated C++ files out of magic.