> Seems reasonable? As long as you're getting benefit from Qt by distributing software using it you need to keep paying for it? Development, distribution and u

> Seems reasonable? As long as you're getting benefit from Qt by distributing software using it you need to keep paying for it? Development, distribution and usage are different things. I don't have much of a problem with selling a subscription for the development environment, but for distribution and usage you should only need a (perpetual) runtime license, which you usually buy in bulk. AFAIK that's how QNX does it, for instance.