If a person has no symptoms, I think it is reasonable to say they are "asymptomatic". There is absolutely a difference between 'yet to have' and 'never will ha

If a person has no symptoms, I think it is reasonable to say they are "asymptomatic". There is absolutely a difference between 'yet to have' and 'never will have' but I think it is potentially confusing to attempt to delineate between asymptomatic and "pre-symptomatic". The main concern with messaging that causes confusion in this regard is that a superficial reading of "asymptomatic doesn't spread virus" would imply that if you aren't symptomatic, you aren't a danger.