8 ms·
This is an interesting topic for me because I hold a handful of domain names (10-20) that I'm not using and have often had this internal debate. I have them be
by rdgthree 6y ago
This is an interesting topic for me because I hold a handful of domain names (10-20) that I'm not using and have often had this internal debate.
I have them because they're ideal names for a few side projects I've been considering building now or in the future, and I hold on to them because I want to make sure I have them if inspiration hits for any of the given projects.
I'm sure many of you own some "aspirational" domain names like this, and while I realize it's a much different scale, why is it functionally different than the OP? Is there a reasonable quantity of unused domain names for an individual to own before it becomes unethical?
I wouldn't want to hold a domain from someone else who wanted it in good faith and was going to use it (like I hope to, eventually), but if I want a good domain name for a product I'm building in the future, I have to play the game a bit ahead of time.
- donmcronald 6y ago> I'm sure many of you own some "aspirational" domain names like this, and while I realize it's a much different scale, why is it functionally different than the OP? It's squatters that have created the situation where people feel the need to hold on to domains they might use because the second you let them drop they'll be snapped up by a squatter if they're even half decent.