2 ms·

OK. I'll do: const result = await get() set(result) But you do you. Current node and console have top level await BTW.

• postalrat 6y ago
  That only works in an async function. The then example doesn't have that requirement. So the alternative shouldn't either.
  • nailer 6y ago
    Yes, your example isn't complaining about then() being clearer than await (because it isn't) but rather complaining that top level await isn't everywhere yet. In other words, your complaints have disappeared in node, and will soon in browsers: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-top-level-await https://github.com/tc39/proposal-top-level-await So yes: set(await get())
    • postalrat 6y ago
      Sometimes you may need to handle a promise in a function that can't be made async.
      • nailer 6y ago
        If a function is inherently sync, then it shouldn't be using promises.