4 ms·
This is a completely ridiculous argument. You're essentially saying that anyone who has objections to a particular tool has never used it, for if they had, they
by jaredcwhite 6y ago
This is a completely ridiculous argument. You're essentially saying that anyone who has objections to a particular tool has never used it, for if they had, they'd certainly love it.
Well I've written Tailwind extensively and I don't care for it at all. I also don't agree with most of Adam's arguments, whether made three years ago or today. Shocking, apparently!
- earthboundkid 6y agoNo, I’m saying that discussion of TW on HN is dominated by points that aren’t relevant if you’ve used it. There are plenty of real ways to criticize TW—the choice of variants is quirky, dev builds slow hot reloading a lot, it doesn’t cover a lot of cases which leads to “Bailwind”, and more I’m sure that I’m not thinking of now—but the criticisms that “it adds too many classes to HTML” or “semantics!” are boring and not useful.
- aidos 6y agoI suspect you're trolling because your other comment implies that you don't know Tailwind at all.
- jaredcwhite 6y agoI've written thousands of lines of React components and stylesheets using Tailwind. Have you?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- eyelidlessness 6y agoIt’s literally the No True Scotsman fallacy