5 ms·
>Nobody really brings up that the bay area is one of few places in the US where you can live without a car. Not really, not compared to Boston or, particularly
by eli_gottlieb 6y ago
>Nobody really brings up that the bay area is one of few places in the US where you can live without a car.
Not really, not compared to Boston or, particularly, New York.
- rpearl 6y agoThe rest of that paragraph says: > beyond a select few, similarly expensive places. Nobody's putting Boston and NYC on the list of cheap places to live, any more than SF. That said, someone in a different part of this thread brought up Chicago, which seems plausible! Though I haven't been there enough to know if that's true! (Though when I visited, their transit definitely was very good).
- city41 6y agoI lived in Chicago for five years without a vehicle. It's very doable, the train pretty much goes everywhere.