Better how? Scientists and professors with decades of experience in this exact field, disagree[0]. Burning wood even discharges more CO2 in the atmosphere, tha

Better how? Scientists and professors with decades of experience in this exact field, disagree[0]. Burning wood even discharges more CO2 in the atmosphere, than coal[1] and we haven't even started to talk about where all those trees must be grown to keep up with the demand of an energy policy based on solar/wind + biofuel backup, like we are planning in Denmark. It is not a terribly good idea and it is infuriating how little science and facts matter to a political discusssion that one would think was based around those elements. [0] https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/03/opinion/pruitt-forests-burning-energy.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/03/opinion/pruitt-forests-bu... [1] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa512/meta https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa512/...