2 ms·
With rebase I keep my commits small, easier to merge then. I've seen strange things slip through large commits. E.g. Someone (me) missed the deleted files, reba
by pastage 6y ago
With rebase I keep my commits small, easier to merge then. I've seen strange things slip through large commits. E.g. Someone (me) missed the deleted files, rebased and hence recreated them.
Then I tried to squash them before merging. But if you squash your commits you get a large commit and you get the same problem. Oh well...
I guess it's easier when you have small features.