>so why shouldn’t we be allowed to use them if they can be used safely? Because California generally decides these things not based on whether they can be done

>so why shouldn’t we be allowed to use them if they can be used safely? Because California generally decides these things not based on whether they can be done safely, but whether they can be done unsafely. If someone could be harmed by something then nobody can have that something. That's just how they do things.