4 ms·
It doesn't really matter, because 30 years means: - He will be 75 years old and he won't be accountable for that decision - We will lose the battle against cl
by vaylian 6y ago
It doesn't really matter, because 30 years means:
- He will be 75 years old and he won't be accountable for that decision
- We will lose the battle against climate change. We simply do not have 30 years to become free from fossil fuels
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- DubiousPusher 6y ago> We will lose the battle against climate change. We simply do not have 30 years to become free from fossil fuels My understanding is that despite +2C being an important limit we should not cross, that every bit of warming we stop above that provides increasing benefit because every bit above +2C is increasingly harmful (i.e. the increase from +3C to +4C is much worse than the increase from +2C to +3C).
- grecy 6y ago> - We will lose the battle against climate change. We simply do not have 30 years to become free from fossil fuels So are you saying we should do what every other country is doing to end their reliance and production of fossil fuels - namely nothing ? Currently, Denmark are the world leader, and we should acknowledge that as a HUGE win.
- vaylian 6y agoThis is not what I am saying. I am saying we don't have 30 years. Waiting 30 years is like saying that lifeboats will be delivered next week, while the Titanic is already sinking. I do appreciate every step in the right direction. I really do. But this is not even an attempt to make a step. The climate minister will be in retirement in 2050 and take no political responsibility.