4 ms·
PAL also requires considerably more accurate and consistent color information. NTSC displays will usually take almost anything close and display it. See the A
by ddingus 6y ago
PAL also requires considerably more accurate and consistent color information. NTSC displays will usually take almost anything close and display it.
See the Apple 2 video circuit for a great example of that.
- iso1631 6y agoHence "Never Twice the Same Colour"
- ddingus 6y agoWith high persistence phosphors, PAL is nice. The higher frequency color makes a notable difference. 50hz was often just a bit slow for me. PAL 60 is where it was truly at, IMHO. Both formats have nice abuse potential, and exploiting it on early computers, and later on, microcontrollers, is a lot of fun.