3 ms·
This is why i had hopes for AI blockchains as the data and trained models or functional algorithms could be verifiably provable as increasing usability/producti
by dredds 6y ago
This is why i had hopes for AI blockchains as the data and trained models or functional algorithms could be verifiably provable as increasing usability/productivity/efficiency etc. You could still say your device/robot didn't improve, but if you continued using the models or algorithms then that would be noticeable. You would have to know they were still being used though, so you would need a time-sensitive encryption that calls home to activate, and if used in multiple instances you'd know that too. But reverse engineering the encryption to get the secret sauce sounds like a workaround. It could be made difficult for average folk, but not impossible. The real advantage would be micro/nano-payments and fee-less transactions since the device is the "miner", ie. by not using BTC/ETH etc.
At the end of the day a subscription model is probably easier.
- howlgarnish 6y agoAI blockchains? Encryption that calls home? Wut?
- dredds 6y agohttps://github.com/steven2358/awesome-blockchain-ai https://github.com/steven2358/awesome-blockchain-ai (works in progress, some more like app stores)
- castlecrasher2 6y agoIs there a single case of a blockchain-enhanced service where the end result is provably better than a centralized system? I'm cynical given that every case I've seen so far has turned out to be rubbish, though admittedly I'm not heavily in that space.
- dredds 6y agoDistributed energy grid because you don't want centralized taxation, and it's tangible. The step change in software/OS from boxed to subscription will continue to next phase. With AI the current subscription model is probably not granular enough. Every device/robot will switch tasks and capabilities and upgrades/downgrades with such a frequency that traditional subscription breaks (refunds/tax/fees etc) so blockchain subscription per device without human interaction will probably work better. AI is bots learning from bots which is already distributed, so centralizing that may be inefficient (high bandwidth).
- intotheabyss 6y agoThere's some defi apps that allow you to buy non-custodial versions of synthetic stocks 24/7. I would say this is provably better than the current centralized system. If all stocks were issued as tokens, then the velocity of money would drastically increase. In addition, the tokens themselves could be allocated to automated contracts for liquidity and to receive yield for lending/burrowing. Peer to peer finance.