6 ms·
Blockchain and energy-saving in same sentence sounds like oxymoron. But yeah "relatively" it probably would be. edit: checked out the whitepaper, its not even
by codegladiator 6y ago
Blockchain and energy-saving in same sentence sounds like oxymoron. But yeah "relatively" it probably would be.
edit: checked out the whitepaper, its not even about the blockchain saving any energy itself. instead you save energy somewhere and record it on blockchain... for ... ?
- nathias 6y agoIt's not an oxymoron to anyone even remotely acquainted with crypto.
- ForHackernews 6y agoAre there any non-Proof-of-Work blockchains in real use? (don't say ETH)
- capnorange 6y agoSolana. It powers Audius which has ~300,000 monthly users.
- joosters 6y agoSolana is centralized - it recently completely froze because a single server was giving faulty data. This weakness has been known about for a long time, e.g. https://twitter.com/el33th4xor/status/1313425180635660288 https://twitter.com/el33th4xor/status/1313425180635660288
- capnorange 6y agoThe issue was an implementation bug afaict and from official responses. Solana is clearly BFT, unlike what Emin claims. To be fair, I don't expect Solana to be as centralised as other chains only for the reason that you need a gaming rig to run a consensus node. Solana is not centralised for the reasons you mention.
- nathias 6y agoAny PoS crypto? There are thousands.
- bccdee 6y agoAlgorand is the only functioning proof-of-stake blockchain that I'm aware of at the moment, and it seems like it hasn't really seen much success.
- Smaug123 6y agoYou'll have to back up that assertion, I'm afraid. Bruce Schneier refers to it as "enormous environmental waste" in https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2019/02/blockchain_and_.html https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2019/02/blockchain_an... .
- nathias 6y agoProof of stake has been a thing since 2013 ...
- saagarjha 6y agoBut it hasn’t really been adopted in a very successful manner, has it?
- nathias 6y agoAdopted in a very successful manner? What does that mean? What a ridiculous standard. Technology exists, if you don't use it its not the fault of the tech. Its not hard to understand: "if X has green and non-green options, and you choose non-green, that doesn't mean you can claim X is non-green."
- ForHackernews 6y agoAny day now the Semantic Web is gonna solve all our problems for us...
- saagarjha 6y agoLack of widespread adoption provides circumstantial evidence that a technology might not be ready or practical yet.
- dannyw 6y agoEthereum 2.0 just launched less than a week ago.
- 6y ago
- jnsaff2 6y agoA central blockchain has not a lot more energy use than a regular database. It's the distributed trustless proof of work kinda blockchain that mindlessly burns up energy.
- mikro2nd 6y agoA central blockchain is an oxymoron: a pointless waste of time. A distributed, trustless, permissionless data structure on the other hand is a useful thing to have for a small number of use-cases.
- arcticbull 6y agoA small number of use cases, were pretty sure. So far the number of realized, actual extant use cases is between 0 and 1 depending on who you ask.
- mikro2nd 6y agoPersonally I'm aware of three that I'd count as good use-cases. Only one of those is a cryptocurrency.
- arcticbull 6y agoI'm aware of 0 including cryptocurrency but I'm sure you already knew that haha.
- SquareWheel 6y agoAs a reminder https://www.cryptoisnotcryptocurrency.com/ https://www.cryptoisnotcryptocurrency.com/