This is really low quality. 3 of 5 are known and uncontested, made up to be a big deal while they are not. Most of my friends use Telegram (a few hundred). Non

This is really low quality. 3 of 5 are known and uncontested, made up to be a big deal while they are not. Most of my friends use Telegram (a few hundred). None of them mention security as a reason for using Telegram. Writing it this way is equally stupid to making a big deal out of of the fact that everything you post on Twitter is by default public: yes, everbody knew in the same way everybody who needs to know knows that Telegram is only point-to-point encrypted, not e2e-encrypted. Then there's the two last ones: - According to the article Telegram tolerates nazis: here Vice makes a mess in at least three ways: 1. If contents were encrypted the way they wished further up, Telegram couldn't even remove it. 2. Telegram bans open groups and channels that promote illegal content. They just haven't AFAIK been caught nosing in private messages. IMO this is a goodnthing. 3. They also mix a lot of unrelated stuff here: I can disagree all I want with all them, but COVID-19 deniers, neonazis and QAnon doesn't belong together in this paragraph. - According to Vice Telegram refuses to talk to journalists. Because of the mess above I support Telegram even if they refuse to speak to this journalist. There are journalists and there are journalists. Some will follow a story wherever the facts lead them, others will go wherever as long as they can sense the sweet smell of clicks.