5 ms·
I dunno, the first one sounds like random dissonant noise to me, the second one is a bit less grating to listen to still not what i would enjoy though or what i
by grawprog 6y ago
I dunno, the first one sounds like random dissonant noise to me, the second one is a bit less grating to listen to still not what i would enjoy though or what i would really consider music. Not quite what i had in mind.
- Slow_Hand 6y agoYeah. It’s definitely an acquired taste. I would describe their musical arc as a pair of British B-boys who took super-hard to the beatmaking aspect of early electro hiphop and then pushed that as far as they possibly could. They’re certainly not songs, in the western sense of having chords and melody. It’s a very different and unrelated paradigm. It’s primarily an exploration of rhythm and timbre. I would not be surprised to discover that a lot of what sounds like musical texture is, in fact, very dense rhythmic sequences. I find it thrilling. Once you live with it for a bit you can grow accustomed to it and start to recognize the inner-logic of how it works. I know that they perceive it as dance music, but I perceive it more as braindance.
- piva00 6y agoTo give you perspective of the range Autechre has, this track is much closer to mainstream song writing than their generative and left field stuff: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkTJTf7Yvk8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkTJTf7Yvk8 It's an acquired taste when you go through their discography and start to notice the intricacies of the creations, their rhythms and sound design are really damn hard to replicate.
- meowface 6y agoExposure is a lot of it. They have tons of devoted fans and are some of the most beloved musicians on music sites I go on. It just takes one's brain some time to carve new grooves and perceptions of meter, like for a lot of avant-garde music. (Not to say everyone who exposes themselves to a lot of it will like it - it's necessary but not sufficient.)