4 ms·

You're getting a lot of hate for this comment but I think it's an important discussion. It isn't easy to "just go somewhere else" or "start your own thing" for

You're getting a lot of hate for this comment but I think it's an important discussion. It isn't easy to "just go somewhere else" or "start your own thing" for a variety of reasons. The reality is that the majority of these game developers aren't getting job offers every day and don't have access to the kind of capital necessary to start a company. It's flippant to suggest that these developers can just find another job, because the other reality is that most of these developers would only be able to find jobs doing the same thing but under a different moniker. People in other places in this thread have produced some solutions, which I think is somewhere along the lines of organizing and unionizing, and I think that would help for bigger companies who are known to exploit these workers. Whatever the solution, history has shown that you cannot rely on a company's word that they won't do this anymore.

pie_flavor 6y ago
You perhaps miss the point of 'then start your own thing'. It is not meant as a realistic suggestion of where to take your career. It is meant to point out that the employer/employee relationship is one-directional for relative profit because it's the other direction in relative stability and investment. You are correct in your analysis that developers don't have access to the kind of capital necessary to start a company. That's the point - you can't predicate an argument on 'the actual workers only get a small fraction' when minus a stable job you would only be able to output a small fraction. Plus the development abstraction layer influences public perception as much as it does developer perception. https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2006/04/11/the-development-abstraction-layer-2/ https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2006/04/11/the-development-ab...
- dathinab 6y ago
  But so do you miss the point as providing a working place which an employee can get by "start your own thing" does in no way imply that it's acceptable to abuse your employee just because they depend on you. In the end they get a reasonable wage for the normal work they do, but not if crunch is involved. Which, do to the large amount of stress and in turn health (physical+mental) and social risk it can involve doesn't seem reasonable for "any" amount of money (or at least any amount any person would be willing to pay ;=) ).
dathinab 6y ago
Yep, exactly that. > "just go somewhere else" Mostly means leaving the game industry, which also means leaving behind years of experience, and the area of expertise you prefer to work in (if it wouldn't be for the working conditions). > "start your own thing" Is in general just unrealistic as an advise for most people. It's risky, costly, stressfull and needs a bunch of additional skills which are not necessary part of your current job.

pie_flavor 6y ago

You perhaps miss the point of 'then start your own thing'. It is not meant as a realistic suggestion of where to take your career. It is meant to point out that the employer/employee relationship is one-directional for relative profit because it's the other direction in relative stability and investment. You are correct in your analysis that developers don't have access to the kind of capital necessary to start a company. That's the point - you can't predicate an argument on 'the actual workers only get a small fraction' when minus a stable job you would only be able to output a small fraction. Plus the development abstraction layer influences public perception as much as it does developer perception. https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2006/04/11/the-development-abstraction-layer-2/ https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2006/04/11/the-development-ab...

dathinab 6y ago
But so do you miss the point as providing a working place which an employee can get by "start your own thing" does in no way imply that it's acceptable to abuse your employee just because they depend on you. In the end they get a reasonable wage for the normal work they do, but not if crunch is involved. Which, do to the large amount of stress and in turn health (physical+mental) and social risk it can involve doesn't seem reasonable for "any" amount of money (or at least any amount any person would be willing to pay ;=) ).

dathinab 6y ago

Yep, exactly that. > "just go somewhere else" Mostly means leaving the game industry, which also means leaving behind years of experience, and the area of expertise you prefer to work in (if it wouldn't be for the working conditions). > "start your own thing" Is in general just unrealistic as an advise for most people. It's risky, costly, stressfull and needs a bunch of additional skills which are not necessary part of your current job.