3 ms·
I think the reason it keeps coming up is that it is the most prominent bad review, but due to Moorhead’s allegiances, poor calls in the past, and eclectic selec
by faitswulff 6y ago
I think the reason it keeps coming up is that it is the most prominent bad review, but due to Moorhead’s allegiances, poor calls in the past, and eclectic selection of software, his negative review comes across as being in bad faith.
- gameswithgo 6y agoor maybe it just really is in bad faith?
- whynotminot 6y agoIt's part of the Forbes contributor network. Bad faith is kind of assumed. edit: Downvote if you want, I'm not kidding. Disingenuous hot takes without much connection to reality is a feature over at Forbes when it comes to tech, not a bug. They're literally traffic mercenaries over there. I'm sure Moorhead is smarting maybe little from the internet anger, but also not too upset to collect a nice bonus before Christmas. I'm sure another Forbes contributor will reprise the role of shit-stirrer-in-chief for the inevitable M2 as well.
- faitswulff 6y agoAlmost certainly.
- ksec 6y agoYes, but he was also the only one who had the guts to stand up against Apple in the Apple vs Qualcomm Trial. If I had believed everything the media and Tim Cook portrayed I would have been completely on Apple's side.