3 ms·
It seems there wasn't collective agreement with residents about safety concerns of the cladding, since if there was, surely residents wouldn't have rejected the
by krona 6y ago
It seems there wasn't collective agreement with residents about safety concerns of the cladding, since if there was, surely residents wouldn't have rejected the installation of an adequate sprinkler system? The council leader has publicly said residents (collectively) didn't want the added disruption during the refurbishment.
- thefringthing 6y ago> surely residents wouldn't have rejected the installation of an adequate sprinkler system Possibly their idea was that if they allowed the sprinkler system they would have to give up on preventing the cladding.