>I don't see what exists to be gained by explaining the function of a weapon that jeopardizes and frightens your diplomats. Why would that be more frightening

>I don't see what exists to be gained by explaining the function of a weapon that jeopardizes and frightens your diplomats. Why would that be more frightening than releasing a report saying they were probably attacked by an unknown microwave weapon? I think a radiation beam powerful enough to hurt people as described but able to avoid detection seems unlikely. Anything similar to interference is unlikely to cause damage.