3 ms·
Good point, I agree. My implication was that in the absence of all the facts, many are making a deliberate choice to believe one side or the other. As far as
by chishaku 6y ago
Good point, I agree.
My implication was that in the absence of all the facts, many are making a deliberate choice to believe one side or the other.
As far as this specific community, I'm not surprised that many (not all) take Google at their word.
- zepto 6y agoWhat facts do you think are missing, and what do you mean by ‘a deliberate choice to believe one side or the other’?
- chishaku 6y agoMost of the circumstances around the firing are hearsay. My weakly-held assessment agrees with your comment here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25316014 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25316014 The following comment and thread demonstrate how many in the HN community reflexively defend Google. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25320745 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25320745
- zepto 6y agoInteresting. It seems like we share an overall impression of what is going on. It seems to me that ‘reflexive’ and ‘deliberate’ are contradictory adjectives when assessing people’s responses.