4 ms·
I think another problem for the minicomputer companies is that they were doing everything themselves: CPU design, board design & manufacturing, system design &
by prirun 6y ago
I think another problem for the minicomputer companies is that they were doing everything themselves: CPU design, board design & manufacturing, system design & manufacturing, OS, compilers, and other required software, sales, support, etc.
With microcomputers, Microsoft focused on the OS, Intel on the CPU, and a gaggle of other companies did board design, system design, sales and support.
I worked at Prime Computer, a competitor of DEC. Prime was a very innovative company too. But like DEC, they had built their business selling largeish minicomputer systems to largeish customers. Prime tried to make a small Unix tower system, a PC, port their OS to Intel CPUs, etc., but they had to continue supporting their current proprietary customer base at the same time. And when making new products like a Prime PC, it had to interface well with the proprietary systems or existing customers wouldn't be interested. That means more engineering work and a higher price tag. Existing customers wouldn't be interested because of the higher price.
It's tough to build a huge business, continue to support that, and at the same time start a completely new business. Company cultures usually can't change fast enough to make the transition.
- Razengan 6y ago> I think another problem for the minicomputer companies is that they were doing everything themselves: CPU design, board design & manufacturing, system design & manufacturing, OS, compilers, and other required software, sales, support, etc. Aside from manufacture maybe, isn't Apple doing exactly all that? And not only succeeding, but dragging everyone else along with them; M1 Macs seem to be getting better third-party support at a faster rate in mere months than other attempts at ARM desktops/laptops did in years, like Microsoft/Windows.