5 ms·
The other curious thing is, behind the pink-boxed redactions are the names of four other Google employees. I'm wondering why they haven't been reprimanded in th
by paperdropper 6y ago
The other curious thing is, behind the pink-boxed redactions are the names of four other Google employees. I'm wondering why they haven't been reprimanded in the same way. At least, not that we know of.
- bitcharmer 6y agoMaybe unlike the hero of the story they refrained from making racist, misandric remarks about their bosses on Twitter?
- that_guy_iain 6y agoWell, she wasn't reprimanded for writing the paper nor for publishing it. In fact, she wasn't even reprimanded as far as I know for telling other employees to stop working on DEI. She told them she wanted confidental information or she will quit on a date she would like. They said they would not give her that information and that she is no longer welcome at the company. This isn't really reprimanding or even a normal firing. If I tell my boss do X or I quit and they say "Thanks for your work, we accept your resigination and the legal notice period applies." Fair play.
- paperdropper 6y ago> She told them she wanted confidental information I understand this is only because upper management had chosen to anonymize their review of the paper, which is apparently quite unusual in Google.