3 ms·
> default stylesheets if these were not a tasteless disaster that nobody can stand. I beg to disagree. Having browsed quite a few sites with css disabled over
by enriquto 6y ago
> default stylesheets if these were not a tasteless disaster that nobody can stand.
I beg to disagree. Having browsed quite a few sites with css disabled over the years, I can assess that default stylesheets tend to grow in you and that you may end up liking them.
In a saner world, all sites would use default stylesheets (with empty css), and individual users would set up whatever css they deem beautiful each day.
- rmetzler 6y agoI kind of agree, because I like to use the Reader view on mobile. What I dislike most about the default css on most browsers is the New Times Roman font and the fact that content can take the whole width of the browser view.
- enriquto 6y agoI like the times new roman font, but you can easily change it in your browser configuration if it bothers you. Regarding full-width content, maybe your browser window is too wide? or your font is too small?