The link is my profile. It is a forum website with accounts, tagging, sorting, and moderation. All these features are accessible to Netscape 2+ and IE3+, and

The link is my profile. It is a forum website with accounts, tagging, sorting, and moderation. All these features are accessible to Netscape 2+ and IE3+, and also Opera 3+, Opera 12, Lynx, Links, w3m, NetSurf, Dillo, and many others, with and without JS enabled. Accounts require cookies for now. Some enhancements require JS. Mostly built by one dev in (copious) spare time. My motivation is to preserve the knowledge of building compatible Web apps, to allow anyone to access my site, and to embarrass the big websites which complain if your Chrome is a couple versions behind. I believe in aiming for 100%, not 95% accessibility, and here are some scenarios I've tested with: * Older devices like my beloved iPads running iOS 7 and 8, which won't upgrade past that. * Vision-impaired users with screen readers. * Library computers stuch with IE and very old Firefox. * Restricted access connections, browsing (and posting, and voting) via Google Translate. * Slow connections and slow devices forced to browser without JS. * Text-mode browsers Lynx and Links which were my only option at the time. * Device without a keyboard available (I have several on-screen keyboards to choose from) * Device without my keyboard layout of choice. With JS, I have two translit options at this time: phonetic-Cyrillic and Dvorak. NoJS support to come. * Retro browsers from a long time ago with their unique beauty and features, e.g. Mosaic, IE3, Netscape, IE6, Opera 3, etc. Some may consider these to be "edge cases" not worth a bother, at less than 0.1% of the visitors. I guess they might also consider a wheelchair ramp unnecessary, since it only gets used like once a year. I consider all these scenarios to be opportunities.