4 ms·
Sure, I didn't mean to imply it was proof one way or the other, just that it's not a universal thing. I've actually never heard the term "quackery" but I do lik
by kingosticks 6y ago
Sure, I didn't mean to imply it was proof one way or the other, just that it's not a universal thing. I've actually never heard the term "quackery" but I do like it.
- inimino 6y agoThere's also "pseudoscience". Unfortunately all too common in ML, where the ratio of published papers to genuine new developments is (charitably) at least 2:1.