2 ms·
> Reset / normalize may not be the best terms to use, but effectively that is what you are doing. Like others and I have mentioned before, this is not what thi
by susam 6y ago
> Reset / normalize may not be the best terms to use, but effectively that is what you are doing.
Like others and I have mentioned before, this is not what this CSS is doing, not even effectively. Calling it so would be a mischarterization of this CSS because what this is doing is far simpler than reset/normalization. This may be splitting hairs but I think good terminology and good conventions form the foundation of a good discussion. I liked it better when you characterized this CSS as "exceptionally basic stuff". That is indeed what this is.
> Sorry if I’m being harsh, but I rather be honest than give some cursory congratulations.
Honest feedback on this CSS is very welcome. Indeed, many others have done so in this thread which helped in improving the CSS as well as the README. That's the whole point of a Show HN post. However, in your previous message you began suggesting what type of problems I should solve instead of sharing this CSS. That felt strange because I am just sharing my hobby work here for fun. I especially did not ask for advice on what I should do with my leisure time.