3 ms·
If you want to keep the same level of economic activity, then low density requires a really good transportation system (be it more highways for private cars or
by fuoqi 6y ago
If you want to keep the same level of economic activity, then low density requires a really good transportation system (be it more highways for private cars or better public transport). Roughly speaking, every person living in a city cluster should be able to reliably get to any other person living in the same cluster in 60-90 minutes tops, otherwise they are much less likely to interact with each other. More people inside this radius, more economic activity you will get (of course, it's not a linear dependency, the principle of diminishing returns applies here as well). High-density provides double win in this regard, not only you shrink distances, but also more people live inside the same area.
So until we get a transport revolution (be it autonomous cars, flying taxis, advanced concepts of public transportation or something else), I highly doubt low-density will be economically viable for core clusters.