2 ms·
What is really amazing is that this paper has been rejected in the first place (among others). http://www.fang.ece.ufl.edu/reject.html http://www.fang.ece.ufl.
by dwenzek 6y ago
What is really amazing is that this paper has been rejected in the first place (among others).
http://www.fang.ece.ufl.edu/reject.html http://www.fang.ece.ufl.edu/reject.html
I once read this story in either ACM or IEEE but failed to find the exact reference. It was an editorial relating famous papers rejected by the journal. Does anyone have this reference?
- lifepillar 6y agoI’d say that the reviews you have cited are satirical.
- lifepillar 6y agoI retract my assessment. I have found what appears to be the original paper ([0], from Computer 2005), and there is no indication that the reviews are fake. On the contrary, it appears that they are brought up as striking examples of a reviewer's incompetence. Wow! [0] https://wp.doc.ic.ac.uk/cairesfe/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2014/12/reject.pdf https://wp.doc.ic.ac.uk/cairesfe/wp-content/uploads/sites/80...
- lifepillar 6y agoOk, I've read everything more carefully: those are clearly hypothetical, entertaining reviews. Hints: (1) the link at the beginning; (2) no references to the sources :-)
- dwenzek 6y agoThank you. This is the article I remember. And yes, I have been fooled. This is a lesson to only cite (and even remember) carefully read articles!