3 ms·
The op I responded to > I'm pretty sure the tendency for LSD users to ethically object to war or other offensive violence is exactly why the US decided it sho
by tayo42 6y ago
The op I responded to
> I'm pretty sure the tendency for LSD users to ethically object to war or other offensive violence is exactly why the US decided it should be treated as more dangerous than crystal meth
The point I was trying to make
> It was pretty clearly a moral panic. Had absolutely nothing to do with science.
It has nothing to with being anti war, lawmakers panicked when it became a recreational drug and didn't know what to do.
Also california and nevada made lsd illegal in 1966
- pmoriarty 6y ago"california and nevada made lsd illegal in 1966" So still the late 60's, not "the end of 50s early 60s". "It has nothing to with being anti war, lawmakers panicked when it became a recreational drug and didn't know what to do" It was a recreational drug long before it was made illegal, and the illegality had nothing to do with it being a recreational drug, but rather had to do with panic over sensationalized media stories about LSD's involvement in things like the Manson murders, and Art Linkletter's daughter committing suicide. LSD's role is Linkletter's daughter's suicide is highly questionable, as are all the urban legends at the time of people frying their eyes out by staring at the sun under the influence of LSD, or their chromosomes breaking because of LSD, etc. Yet sensational media coverage like this, along with a panic over "look what all these crazy kids are doing! They're having orgies and frying their brains on LSD!!!", combined with LSD's association with the anti-war movement and the counterculture (including Leary very publicly telling kids to "drop out", LSD being associated with "free love", etc), which shocked and outraged the very conservative powers that be is absolutely what led to it being banned. LSD use was basically seen as a threat to established social order.