3 ms·
Not the most polite post, but I think this is necessary given that the authors continued to promote the scheme even after it was shown to be broken.
by tasquatch 6y ago
Not the most polite post, but I think this is necessary given that the authors continued to promote the scheme even after it was shown to be broken.
- tomcam 6y agoI thought it was perfectly polite and far more evenhanded than it needed to be. One could argue that the authors of the original paper and the bell labs judges were acting in a hostile fashion.
- Ar-Curunir 6y agoI think the post is frustrated with the attitude of authors who should really know better; Sanjeev Arora is a giant of theoretical computer science, and he should know to do better than this