3 ms·
Wouldn't it be more reasonable to assume that they're not trying to profit from their real estate side business and are instead legitimately interested in slowi
by jrockway 6y ago
Wouldn't it be more reasonable to assume that they're not trying to profit from their real estate side business and are instead legitimately interested in slowing the spread of COVID-19? They probably did some risk analysis and that guided how many on-campus students they could accept. They then accepted that many students. If other students show up on campus after agreeing not to, then their risk assessment is wrong, and the entire program is jeopardized.
The language in the letter triggers my "the lawyers are panicking" detector more than my "you're screwing us out of a few bucks" detector.
- kortilla 6y ago> Wouldn't it be more reasonable to assume that they're not trying to profit from their real estate side business and are instead legitimately interested in slowing the spread of COVID-19 No, if this is what they truly cared about, there wouldn’t be 3 different choices for students. All would be required to stay remote with special exemptions for those who don’t have a safe home otherwise.